I started this site to deal with things that I wanted to post without bothering the Lagrandil.com crowd.
I want to state for the record that not all atheists are trolls. Just this one.
Now you may demonstrate your predictively dishonest *reply, should you choose to validate my claims about you Nephy.
Scorn and name-calling do not increase your argument’s persuasive strength to anyone who does not already agree with you, by the way.
Quod Erat Demonstratum
Don’t hide behind anymore excuses and don’t rely on the creation website you linked as they are a laughing stock amongst the scientific community, as their creation /god research is not scientific. Hence it is not published in reputable journals etc..
Now what evidence do you have for your supernatural god and its “creations”?
For example, having provided you with the required data, you supply the rebuttal: “Other scientists make fun of them.”
Perhaps had you demonstrated an attitude other than that of a petulant child holding a tantrum, I might be willing to throw more of my finite time and energy your way. Verbally stomping your feet in no way compels me to do anything more than this.
“Hey look, guys, a god-hating troll. The common North American Troll is not on the endangered species list, but we can hope some day it might be.”
Have the fruit of your beliefs. You stomp your feet and insist that you are a meaningless accidental compilation of chemicals that happens to be self aware. I don’t argue with my vegetable soup, either, because its opinion is largely irrelevant.
Though it is far more polite and respectful in inanimate silence than you are in your bile-spewing.
If you still fallaciously claim otherwise, then give me the details as to what demonstrates creationism is not a failed hypothesis. Then you can give me the evidence for your supernatural entity. Oh lets not forget that you are unable to refute the fact that “creationism/I.D. is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Now either provide me and the scientific community with your contrary evidence or keep bitchin about being butt hurt. Guess what I predict, you will cite no evidence to the contrary and you will continue to claim the Atheists are calling me out on my fallacious god claims and it’s not fair they mock my ( ) (wilful) ignorance. Boohoo 😦
I showed you a peer reviewed journal written by scientists who are creationists.
I particularly enjoyed the article by the Canadian Theoretical physicist Mary Beth De Repentigny on supersymmetry’s strengths and weaknesses in string theory cosmology from the 2008 article, and I still remember getting a bad grade on a differential equations quiz because I spent all weekend digging into an article on micro diamond formation in tectonic ridges observed, and its inferences for geological change rates.
That article, by Meteorologist Michael Oard was critiqued the next article by Dr. John Baumgardener, who holds a Ph.D. in geophysics.
That is peer review, and what ten minutes of research could turn up. Professionals with actual science degrees, CV’s, engaged in peer review.
Personally some of the science is over my head since my college’s Physics program (which was my original degree path) closed down due to budget cuts. So I only got through Diff-EQ and multivariable calculus for the math.
That is peer review.
What’s your degree in, oh enlightened one?
Other Nobel Prize Winners on Intelligent Design and Fine Tuned Universe
ALBERT EINSTEIN, Nobel Laureate in Physics (he believed in a God like Spinoza did, but a God who design echoed throughout the universe)
MAX PLANCK, Nobel Laureate in Physics
WERNER HEISENBERG, Nobel Laureate in Physics
ERWIN SCHRÖDINGER, Nobel Laureate in Physics
ROBERT MILLIKAN, Nobel Laureate in Physics:
CHARLES TOWNES, Nobel Laureate in Physics
ARTHUR SCHAWLOW, Nobel Laureate in Physics
WILLIAM PHILLIPS, Nobel Laureate in Physics
SIR WILLIAM H. BRAGG, Nobel Laureate in Physics
GUGLIELMO MARCONI, Nobel Laureate in Physics
ARTHUR COMPTON, Nobel Laureate in Physics
ARNO PENZIAS, Nobel Laureate in Physics
ALEXIS CARREL, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology
SIR JOHN ECCLES, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology
JOSEPH MURRAY, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology
SIR ERNST CHAIN, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology
GEORGE WALD, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology (note: he has quotes which defend atheism & deism)
SIR DEREK BARTON, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry
CHRISTIAN ANFINSEN, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry
WALTER KOHN, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry
Got a reason to show me you’re worth more time, or just spewing more bile?
Again I ask you to explain why “creationists” have not received the Nobel or Templeton Prize for their revolutionary, world changing discoveries? Because creationism is not science, and they have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to verify their fallacious claims. Do you even know what the scientific method is? If you did you would be aware that creationism does not meet the criteria for a hypothesis. Why is this fact so hard for you to understand? So there is no misunderstanding Bruce, can you tell me what a hypothesis is, and why you think “creationism” meets the criteria. Then we can discuss things further. Thanks.
Talk goes two ways. You want an answer. Give one or buzz off.
Your generalization is stupid. I give you a list of creationist and ID Nobel prize winners for science. You say no scientist has ever claimed or demonstrated that creation is correct and evolution is disproven.
So… basically you can’t read, or can’t understand the list I just gave you.
They are scientists. They believe in evolution or ID.
You are disproven. Shouting “nuh-uh” repeatedly just makes you look retarded.
You aren’t taking any information. So take your pseudo-intellectual hamster wheel and go away while the grown-ups exchange ideas. Which is where information goes both way.
Like, for example:
You’ve ignored a simple question three times, while I have actually provided data while you shout and whine.
So you’re making repeated verbal thrusts for your own benefit without engaging anyone else in any meaningful way.
I’m not Catholic, but if you’re going to intellectually masturbate can you not do it in public, or our public?
Please cite just ONE piece of research that demonstrates your ignorant and fallacious claim, just ONE SINGLE example? You can’t can you. You don’t even know what the scientific method is, or what a hypothesis is.
Please, do try and keep up as you clearly don’t know what you are (failing) talking about. Come back to me when you stop talking demonstrable nonsense.
If you can’t produce just a single example, then you are just making shit up. If you knew what you were talking about you would not make such elementary scientific errors.
It is quite obvious that you need to do some research, learn what science and the scientific method means. Additionally, you are embarrassingly unaware what a fallacy is.
For someone like you, who claims so much (without an atom of evidence) you do talk a lot of unsubstantiated bullshit. I thought you said you went to school? Now either cite the EVIDENCE or keep quite until the educated adults have finished speaking.
As a bonus cookie to feed the foul-mouthed troll:
Dr. Henry Morris, Ph.D. in Hydrogeology, (that is what is called a terminal degree in the field. Terminal doesn’t mean cancer, like whatever rotted your manners away, but as in there is no higher level of scientific education in his field.) He has published several books on the point you requested.
Books, for a help, are codexes, bound bits with paper in between full of knowledge.
You asked for just one. Not sure at this point you can count higher.
Now, since you’re obviously mentally challenged, I will spell this out slowly.
You. Need. To. Earn. More. Answers.
What is your degree? You’ve given name-calling a go. Since you haven’t demonstrated the basic rules of etiquette or logic, you have yet to convince me you’re worth more precious air.
Whom are you trying to convince? I mean anyone who reads this can scroll upwards and find the references I provided, so it cannot be other readers.
You obviously aren’t going to convince me by calling me names as opposed to exchanging ideas.
So… shouting so loud to convince yourself?
I have answers.
To get them, you need only to answer my question.